It has always been the many faceless men, those foot soldiers who suffered most, who have died. It is they make a nation - F.Sionil Jose
In a recent publication on tiger conservation
in Tamil Nadu state in the South Pole column of the Chennai edition’s Times of
India to coincide with the International Tiger Day 2022, I have outlined the
role of anti-poaching system in the protection of tigers and their habitats. This
global event has been observed on the 29th July every year across the tiger
range nations since 2010, when it was first organized as the Saint Petersburg
Tiger Summit in Russia.
Along with the preservation of the tiger species, the day also aims to protect
and expand their habitats. Many international wildlife organizations such as
the World Wildlife Forum
(WWF), the International Fund for Animal Welfare (IFAW), and the Smithsonian
Institute also observe International Tiger Day.
Having
recognized that 97 per
cent of the global wild tigers had disappeared in the last century, with about
only 3,000 of them surviving, this
symbolic event was mooted by International animal organizations to raise
awareness on the decline of wild tiger numbers, to take stock of the results of
tiger conservation work and to encourage the celebration of success stories. In
the historic timeframe, tiger is now confined only to a minor subset, covering
7 percent area of its original distribution range in the 13 range countries.
Times of India clipping
Tx20 Agenda of 2010 and progress milestones
The 2010 meet launched a tiger recovery agenda namely ‘Global
Tiger Initiative process’ where the participating governments agreed to the
‘Tx2 goal’ - that is to double wild tiger numbers by 2022. To the scientific community and administrative
echelons, familiar with the multitude of severe odds operating continuously
against the survival of this majestic, mega carnivore in their natural
habitats, Tx2 simply seemed to be a grandiose target. Because some of the debilitating
factors such as habitat loss, climate change impacts, hunting and poaching, and
avenge killing continue to threaten the remaining tiger population.
Tiger numbers counted
across the host nations during the last decade vouch for it. At global level,
most tiger range countries are nowhere near the Tx2 finishing line. According
to World Wildlife Fund (WWF) and the Global Tiger Forum, the number of wild tigers has gone up to 3,890
in 2016 from the earlier 2010 estimate of 3,200, marking a mere 22 per cent
increase in the population. The IUCN’s Red List of
Threatened Species Assessment, led by global wild cat conservation organization
Panthera has reported that the global tiger population has stabilized and
increased to an estimated number of 4,500 in 2022, much short of the goal of 6000+ tigers. These increases are attributed to improved survey methods
including expanded survey areas and enhanced protection.
India Shining
Fortunately
for India, the situation is on a positive footing. The nation’s last quadrennial
assessment carried out in 2018 put the number of tigers at 2,967. The results
of 2022 tiger census are underway. Estimated to have grown at the annual
compounding rate of 6 per cent as recorded during the 2006-2018 period, the
computed population of the striped cats in the country in 2022 could have
crossed the Tx2 doubling mark with 3700+ tigers in its range states from its
number of 1706 reported in 2010.
Growth of tiger numbers between 2006 and 2018
In
the corresponding periods of 2006, 2010, 2014 and 2018 four-yearly surveys, wild
tiger count in Tamil Nadu’s forests had registered correspondingly higher
growth rate and the relevant numbers were 76, 163, 229, 264 for the respective
years. In my above paper, I made a brief mention of the elaborate anti-poaching
network that had been put in place in interior and vulnerable tiger habitats
within the sanctuaries and national parks of Tamil Nadu state to prevent the
menace of hunting and poaching of this poster species- much before the range nations
agreed upon the ambitious agenda of doubling the tiger numbers by 2022.
Tracing the genesis of anti-poaching in Madras State
A
peep into the past of anti-poaching establishment in Tamil Nadu reveals that it
was initiated by a Non-Governmental Organization called Nilgiri Game
Association formed during 1877 in British India, later version of which was Niligiri
Wildlife and Environment Association (NWEA, which unfortunately ceases to exist
as on date). Recognizing that the population of game animals in the Nilgiri plateau
was rapidly declining in the face of indiscriminate gaming, the Association among
other things, established check gates in various parts of the Nilgiris and
engaged anti poaching watchers to man them with a view to prevent unauthorized
hunting and control poaching. The intention was clearly to reserve the right of
hunting and shooting of game animals to the members of the Association alone
and nothing beyond. The Association in its new tag went on to work in tandem
with the Nilgiris forest administration by gathering intelligence information
about movement of suspicious people in the forest and their dubious activities
such as poaching of wildlife for meat, skin and tusk and promptly passing them
on to the District Forest Officer for action. Otherwise, in the state
controlled reserved forests, the long-tested system of range administration
with beat perambulation and patrol by the Forest Guard- Reserve Watcher duo
only existed for over a century.
The
sheer enormity of size of a forest beat, sometimes measuring as large as
3000-5000 ha and the inadequacy in protection infrastructure had begun to make
gaping holes in the forest management umbrella and made a mockery of its
protection. Given the growing intrusion of smugglers and poachers into the
forests for wood smuggling and animal poaching, the beat system of protection
soon proved grossly insufficient and totally mismatched the requirements to
face the onslaught from illegal intruders. When the forest brigand Veerppan’s
writ ran large with successive episodes of tusker killing in the North eastern
outer slopes of the Nilgiris reached its peak in the mid 1980s, some innovation
kicked in from the District Forest Officer (DFO) at local level, who mobilized
non-plan funds to commence temporary forest patrol camps with local tribal men
at some old, unused trekking sheds to perambulate and patrol areas susceptible
for hunting and poaching along with beat staff. Three such camps were begun in
Nilgiris North division’s Anaikatti, Mangalppatti and Thengumarahada between
1986 and 1989 at the pioneering initiative of Thiru K.Chidambaram,IFS, the then
DFO of the area. This could be considered as a forerunner for what was to
follow.
Emergence of Mudumalai model
Poaching
pressure in the adjacent Mudumalai sanctuary in the district too was severe,
given its location bordering three states of Tamil Nadu, Kerala and Karnataka.
Mudumalai supports abundant populations of spotted deer, sambhar and mega
herbivores such as gaur and elephant besides the big cats like tiger and
leopard. Interstate poaching gangs would indulge in hunting for venison and
elephant poaching and give a slip into the neighbouring state. Crime graph
jumped up. The then Wildlife Warden of Mudumalai Thiru A.Udhayan, IFS swiftly
responded by installing nine anti poaching camps in vulnerable locations in
1997. Each camp engaged 2-3 tribal men to work with the regular protection
staff.
Functioning
initially as day-time perambulation units, these camps were soon upgraded to 24
hour operational sites. By 2000 when I joined as Conservator of Forests,
Coimbatore Circle having jurisdiction over Mudumalai, the number of camps was
increased to 16. Requisite infrastructure like camp shed, elephant proof
trench, water facility (where necessary), solar lighting, wireless, provision
of wet and dry food rations etc were provided to make round the clock working
of the camp effective. It worked on a pattern of rotating men on a weekly
basis. The system got extended to the adjoining Nilgiris North, South and
Gudalur forest divisions too. The camps were located in a manner to cover a
perambulation radius of 5-6 km. Men in the camp would move around 10-15 km in a
day looking for suspected movement of people. In the process, they began making
detailed noting of animal movement, evidence of illegal tree felling, occurrence
of forest fire etc in a register, which was getting verified by inspecting higher
officials. In a way, the strategy helped preventing wildlife crimes and reducing
the department’s response time to challenge any poaching attempt. Besides, time
lag in reporting of natural and unnatural animal mortality in the wild got
reduced.
The anti
poaching network proved effective in putting down poaching significantly. In
fact, while on patrol the team came face to face with members of poaching gang
on several occasions that helped to apprehend them with seizures immediately
after commission of an offence or even before it was executed. In an incident
in the initial years, exchange of fire between the staff and poachers resulted
in death of one reserve watcher. Being a government employee, the reserve
watcher got the ex-gratia relief. A well meaning member of the NWEA Thiru (Late)
A.C.Soundararajan had an apprehension as to what would happen if some anti
poaching tribal watcher, a temporary hand, succumbed in such an encounter. He
consulted the District officers of forest department in Nilgiris and with their
concurrence enrolled all anti poaching watchers into a Janatha Group Insurance
Scheme in a Public sector Insurance Company. For a one-time premium of Rs 60, the
insured would be compensated with Rs. one lakh in the event of a death while on
duty. A big sum for a poor tribal family those days! It was a rare gesture from
the NWEA which paid the premium amount for the initially insured watchers from
the Association funds. All subsequent induction into the scheme was funded by
the Forest department. The first to avail this financial relief was one Thiru
Seegan, a tribal anti poaching watcher of Mudumalai who lost his life in an
encounter with a bison poaching gang during 2003. With the move in the right
direction from the field offices, forest department was in a position to obtain
a sanction of an ex-gratia of Rs. 3 lakh from the state government for the
deceased watcher’s family, which was the first such case for a temporary
watcher. Further as a symbol of solidarity, staff of Coimbatore circle at my
initiative, voluntarily contributed an amount of about Rs.1.26 lakh that was
given to the watcher’s family.
Its spread:
As
the system started bearing results, the anti poaching watchers came to be
recognized with uniforms. Discussion in the interstate protection meetings with
adjoining states and deliberations in national workshops and seminars resulted
in extension of this new-found protection mechanism to most of the protected
areas across the country. Having seen the success of the system, the Ministry
of Environment and Forests in Government of India and the States started to
make budgetary allocation of funds for operating the anti-poaching network. With
the launch of more and more tiger reserves, this system got strengthened. Thanks to the intensification of anti poaching efforts with standard operating norms organized
poaching has declined. Today, this model of protection, engaging the
local tribal has come to stay as an important component in forest conservation.
As the temporary watchers
continued in service for a reasonably longer period, they clamoured for
permanent position in the department. With no future in sight in any work
place, dedication tends to give way to complacence. Recognizing the need to
plan career progress for them, Forest department in Tamil Nadu issued enabling
Government orders in 2012 to absorb the anti poaching watchers who completed 10
years as anti poaching watcher in the position of supernumerary reserve
watchers. With over 1100 anti poaching watchers in the roll of TN Forest
department, the demand by their Association for permanent position after
certain time of continuous engagement in protection tasks continues.
In any organization engaged
with resource protection, contribution of foot warriors and associated field
staff is immense. But many times, their sacrifice during the call of duty go
unrecorded and unnoticed. They mostly remain unsung heroes. It needs to be
understood that mainstreaming the role of these field formations into the
organizational framework will yield rich dividends. In an unique event of its
sort, based on a proposal from the Government of Tamil Nadu, Ministry of
Environment and Forests conferred a posthumous gallantry award on Thiru Seegan
of Mudumalai, the deceased anti poaching watcher in 2006 for his outstanding
contribution to the cause of wildlife.
In this regard, it is
encouraging to note that the National Tiger
Conservation Authority (NTCA) had begun to recognize exemplary performance of
front line staff by granting awards and evolved a set of guidelines for the
same. The NTCA has presented rewards to field staff of about six TRs during the
International Tiger Day celebrations at Chandrapur, Maharashtra on the 29th
July 2022. Three anti poaching watchers of Tamil Nadu’s Mudumalai Tiger Reserve
were chosen for this honour in recognition of their role in the live capture of
the man-eating tiger of Mudumalai division MDT 23 in October 2021. The award
included cash reward of Rs. one lakh and a citation.
NTCA award function on 29th July 2022
Let the forest departments and the Governments continue to recognize and support the valuable services of these front line warriors in forest and wildlife protection.
Dear Dr Sekar, it is heartening to go through your write up on unsung warriors in the protection, with the feeling that you brought before me the happenings in my days as DFO Nilgiris North, very much alive.
ReplyDeleteIam thankful to you for giving due credits to Mr. Chidambaram, Mr. Udhayan Mr.Seegan etc who had worked in those days and in those elephant territories especially North eastern slopes of Nilgiris which actually form part of crucial annual migratory path as well as breeding areas for the elephants due to the abundance of fodder and flowing water sources.
As you rightly put it, dreaded forest brigand veerappan posed tough challenges to the protection staff as well as the cutting edge field officials . I must acknowledge here that Mr. Chithrappu IFS who was conservator of forests, coimbatore having jurisdiction took a pioneering administrative decision not to punish the field staff who presumably failed to prevent the poaching of elephants.That was a major booster for the Officials and the field staff to work with all energy and dedication. North DFO got allotted more Non plan funds which prompted me to organise anti-poaching camps in deep interiors of god -fore shaken areas of Nilgiris North eastern slopes.As part of field inspection to supervise the working of camps, i ran into life risking encounters with the migrating elephants on two occasions in the night hours.
Mr. Udhayan and Rakesh Dogra as wild life wardens in Mudumalai effectively established Anti-poaching camps and engaging anti poaching watchers who were supplied with rations for entire month along with wages , funded by the state and central government more particularly , subsequently GOI objected to engagement of anti poaching watchers but allowed anti poaching camps. Provision in the budget for continuing anti-poaching camps continued year after year which prompted to the success of engaging anti-poaching watchers in the guise of anti-poaching camps.Office of the Chief wild life warden played crucial role to ensure flow of funds non-stopingly both from state and centre to sustain the concept of anti poaching camp and anti poaching watchers .
I congratulate you for your endeavour to bring out a true and clear picture of the field happenings that took place in the past and evolvement of anti-poaching watchers to present scenario .kudos to you.
It's heartbreaking to see the mistreatment of animals in many industries such as farming, entertainment, and research. We need to demand better standards and regulations to protect the welfare of these animals. Please checkout: Animal Welfare
ReplyDelete